Disposal Wells a Concern for Folks in the
Marcellus Gas Field
by Sue Smith-Heavenrich
Broader View Weekly,
April 24, 2009
Residents of
Chemung and Tioga County joined nearly 130
Bradford County residents for a forum
on“Underground Injection Wells for Waste
Disposal” at Towanda High School on Tuesday,
April 14. The forum, hosted by Penn State
Cooperative Extension and the Bradford
County Natural Gas Advisory Committee
focused on the geology of the region and
regulations concerning Underground Injection
Control (UIC).
Dan Vilello,
of Pennsylvania Department of Environmental
Protection said that DEP issued 8,000
permits last year and 4200 new wells were
drilled, 196 of them into Marcellus shale.
Since January the DEP has issued 1662
drilling permits and Vilello estimated that
by the end of the year they would approve
7,000 Marcellus permits.
Tom Murphy,
from Penn State Cooperative Extension
examined what the influx of drilling means
in terms of the quantity of water that will
be used and the management of wastewater
from the wells. He cited the Susquehanna
River Basin Coalition, estimating that 28
million gallons of water a day will be
withdrawn from the basin at peak use. Twenty
to 30 percent of that water will return from
the well containing high levels of salts,
heavy metals and fracking chemicals. “That
water must be treated before it can be
disposed of,” Murphy said. One option
is to truck the water to a commercial
wastewater treatment facility. Another
option is to send it through a reverse
osmosis unit to extract the salts.
Disposal
Wells an Option
“Due to
costs and environmental concerns, the
preferred option is deep well injections,”
Murphy said. He noted that there are already
eight underground injection (disposal) wells
in Pennsylvania; there are about five
currently in use in New York.
But with the increased drilling activity
planned for 2009 Murphy said that number is
likely to increase. In the Barnett shale
they plan on one underground injection well
for every 100 producing gas wells, he
explained. These deep wells would lie below
the Marcellus formation, most likely 5,000
to 9,000 feet deep.
Murphy
emphasized that disposal wells are
industrial, and there would be a lot of
truck traffic – up to 100 trucks/day with
traffic running 24-hours-a-day,
seven-days-a-week throughout the year. He
mentioned possible issues of noise as well,
and the need for access roads.
“There will
have to be some type of manifest system to
assure that wastewater is disposed of
properly,” Murphy noted. The biggest
environmental issue, aside from ensuring
that there are no surface spills, is to make
sure old and abandoned wells are properly
plugged.
Tom Rice, a
consulting engineering geologist from
Wellsboro, PA gave an overview of geologic
considerations when siting a disposal well.
One of the concerns he noted was that there
be no existing fractures in the rock and
that wastewater be injected below the
Marcellus layer.
Regulatory
Issues
EPA
hydrologist Karen Johnson addressed the
federal regulations regarding underground
disposal. “The purpose of the Underground
Injection Control (UIC) program is to
protect water,” she said. The EPA
regulations assure that UIC wells meet the
requirements of the Safe Drinking Water Act
(SDWA). Thus a disposal well would not be
allowed to contaminate any portion of an
aquifer that supplies a public water system
or is “capable of supporting a public water
system.”
Johnson
clarified that UIC regulations prohibit the
movement of fluid that may pose a potential
endangerment to an underground source of
drinking water. “Plop a person anywhere east
of the Mississippi and there’s a good chance
there’s an aquifer directly beneath his feet
or within a quarter mile,” Johnson said.
Underground
injection does not include hydro-fracking,
as that process was specifically exempted
from the SDWA in 2005. UIC also does not
regulate the storage of gas nor does it
regulate any surface activity associated
with injection wells including ponds, pits,
access roads or pipelines, Johnson
explained.
There are
five classes of underground injection wells,
and the ones under discussion for wastewater
are Class II. These wells require operators
to do preliminary tests in order to
determine at what pressure there will be no
fractures, and whether the underground
geology will accept the wastewater. Because
of the extensive testing, Johnson is
confident that the disposal wells will not
cause underground fractures.
Johnson
pointed out that Texas has close to 7,000
brine disposal wells, and requires one brine
disposal well for every four production
wells. “I think they [gas companies] are
going to go back to those depleted or
unproductive wells and try to use them as
underground injection wells,” she said,
referring to future development of the
Marcellus shale.
When a gas
company applies for a UIC permit they must
document that all other wells in their “area
of review” have been adequately plugged. If
old wells aren’t adequately plugged, the
wastewater injected under pressure may
travel up through the old wells and pollute
groundwater. Although the “area of review”
usually extends 1/2 mile around the proposed
injection well, the UIC well owner needs to
identify all water wells within a one-mile
radius of the proposed UIC well and notify
those landowners.
When asked
about horizontal disposal wells, Johnson
admitted that generally disposal wells are
vertical – they do not go beneath other
properties. “At a minimum we expect the
pressure cone to go as far as 1/2 mile,” she
said. That means that fluid injected into a
disposal well is expected to migrate up to
half a mile from the injection site.
“But how can
we be sure that toxic chemicals won’t leak
out of the UIC well?” someone asked.
“The premise
of the area of review is that any pathway of
migration, such as an abandoned well, would
be plugged,” Johnson said. “Faults and
fractures are taken into account as well,”
she added, but pointed out that no seismic
information was required.
Reprinted
with permission. This article and others
published on the web at
http://www.tiogagaslease.org/broaderviewweekly.html
Support publication of articles like this by
subscribing.*
Upcoming Events:
Thursday, June
11
7 pm
Film:
Rural Impact! followed by reports
on recent developments & audience discussion
Preston Fire Hall, County Route 19, Preston,
NY
just north of the intersection with County
Route 10A (east/west), where County Rte
4/Georgetown Road becomes County Route 19.
Monday,
June 15
6:30pm
Open
Informational Meeting for
Residents of Danby
7:00pm
BRSC
Natural Gas Production
Symposium: Stories from the
Front Line
Tuesday, June 23
7:00pm
Getting
Your Voice Heard in the
Natural Gas Debate: Focus on
the NYS Regulatory Process
For locations & other event details, visit
http://www.un-naturalgas.org/events.htm