Greetings from CDOG             April 25, 2010


Last week, high-profile news stories indicated that "DEC won't allow gas drilling in 'the watershed.'"  Is that true?

Don't trust the DEC

You may have heard or read that the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) has decided not to allow gas drilling within the Catskill and Delaware watersheds, which supply water to NYC.

Don't believe it.

On April 23rd the DEC announced that it will exclude unfiltered water supplies from its generic environmental impact statement. Instead gas drilling applicants will have to go through their own environmental review process to obtain permits. [1] In the 1992 GEIS there are other situations which trigger an additional environmental review.

The main question is why did the DEC decide to release this statement now, instead of including it in the final Supplemental Generic Environmental Impact Statement (SGEIS)?

Here are three good reasons for this public relations stunt:

1. To diminish public opposition

Late last October, just before the start of the public review of the draft SGEIS, Aubrey K. McClendon, the head of Chesapeake Energy, announced that his company would not drill in the Catskill and Delaware watersheds. However, he was not willing to tear up their current leases, or sign a binding agreement never to drill there. Nor could he speak for the dozens of other gas drilling companies. The public saw through his maneuver and submitted over 14,000 comments to the draft.

It seems that Pete Grannis has been taking lessons from the CEO of Chesapeake Energy. After all, he may be working for Chesapeake in a few months.

2. To try an end run around current proposed legislation

Over two dozen bills have been introduced in the NYS legislature about gas drilling. One that is gaining momentum calls for a state-wide moratorium until 120 days after the EPA finishes its report on hydrofracking. [2] Another proposed bill calls for a state-wide ban.

The last thing the DEC and the gas industry want is a multi-year moratorium. This press release is merely an attempt to stop these bills.

3. To try to avoid some legal requirements of their environmental review

NYS is in a very difficult position because no matter what they do they are going to get sued once the SGEIS is finalized. This move is an attempt to avoid some of those legal issues. However, it's not likely to succeed since it simply creates a new legal challenge.

The point is this: gas drilling would still be allowed in unfiltered water supplies. The DEC's decision does not block gas drilling anyplace, and it may not be legal.

[1]. DEC Press Release: DEC Announces Separate Review for Communities With "Filtration Avoidance Determinations"

[2]. Englebright bill, A10490

 


P L E A S E   H E L P   U S   create informed & active communities throughout New York State and beyond - donations of any size will be put to effective use

Mail to   CDOG   PO Box 443   Delhi NY 13753

T H A N K  Y O U

S I G N   T H E   P E T I T I O N   to ban unconventional extraction
 of natural gas in New York State
here

What do you love about living here?  Clean air?  Clean water? 
Whatever is precious to you, the time to take a stand for it is
now.

> un-naturalgas.org/organizers.htm <

 






 

See Split Estate

Saturday, May 15  1:00 P.M. Smart Community Room
Sidney Memorial Library
8 River St, Sidney
FREE ADMISSION
Come early for refreshments & conversation.

For more film info  www.splitestate.com

Part of “The Third Saturday Monthly Film Series”  
Sponsored by: Chenango County Peace Action
Contacts: Ken at kwfogarty@frontiernet.net    Chris at 334-6095


What else is happening?

E V E N T S

Help with this intergroup project


Other news:

Banks aren't lending on leased properties , realtor says; local economies likely to be devastated by gas drilling, and it's already starting

 

 

 

From our inbox - must-see posts:

An A1 industrial zone

Stephanie Hallowich speaks out

Highly recommended: An e-mail subscription to
Faces of Frackland


 


Is natural gas really a clean fuel?

"Natural gas is marketed as a clean fuel with less impact on global warming than oil or coal, a transitional fuel to replace other fossil fuels until some distant future with renewable energy. Some argue that we have an obligation to develop Marcellus Shale gas, despite environmental concerns. I strongly disagree.

"Natural gas as a clean fuel is a myth."

- Cornell professor: "Gas and drilling not clean choices"

See also Cornell scientist tarnishes natural gas's clean image